Rape convict to undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment rules Delhi HC

0
representational image

Due to the increase in sexual offenses against the women in our country and to deal with the accused strictly with no leniency, Delhi High Court has ruled the new verdict according to which Rape convict to undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment. Read the complete report here.

[su_expand more_text=”READ MORE” less_text=” ” height=”0″ hide_less=”yes” link_style=”button” link_align=”center”] According to the news agency PTI, Delhi High Court has ruled the new verdict of 7 years rigorous imprisonment to the rape convict. Earlier the sentence was 3 years. “Rape is a heinous crime not only against the individual but also against the society at large. The offenses against women more particularly under section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) are increasing. Therefore, if such an offense is committed it has to be dealt with strictly and no leniency should be shown,” a bench of justices G S Sistani and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal said.

The bench made the observation while enhancing the three-year jail term to seven years of rigorous imprisonment awarded to convict Tanjeer Alam for raping a 15-year-old girl in May 2011. The court said the punishment prescribed under the IPC reflects the gravity of the offence and its impact on the society. “It is necessary for the courts to imbibe the legislative wisdom and respect it. The legislature in its wisdom made a provision for awarding a sentence of fewer than seven years when there are special and adequate reasons for the same.

“The power under the proviso is not to be used arbitrarily or routinely. It is to be used sparingly and only in cases where special facts and circumstances justify a reduction. In the present case, at the time of the commission of offense, the prosecutrix was less than 16 years of age and the punishment prescribed in the law is minimum seven years of rigorous imprisonment which can be reduced only if there exist some special and adequate reasons for the same,” it said.

The bench said “considering the age of the prosecutrix at the time of the occurrence of the offense… it is not a fit case where sentence less than the minimum should be awarded.” The trial court in November 2015 had convicted and awarded varying jail term to the convict for kidnapping and raping a minor when she was going to meet her father at his stall near Seelampur police station in northeast Delhi.

The sessions court had awarded 3-year jail term to the convict for raping the minor and a year imprisonment for the offense of kidnapping. The convict had denied the allegations and claimed that the girl had gone with him at her own will as she was in love with him and wanted to marry him.

Source: PTI

[/su_expand]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.